When documenting a crisis intervention, how should reports be characterized?

When documenting a crisis intervention, reports should be characterized as objective, sequential, and complete. This approach ensures that the documentation accurately reflects what occurred during the intervention without personal biases or emotional language affecting the clarity of the information.

Being objective means that the report should focus on observable behaviors, specific actions taken, and outcomes rather than personal interpretations or feelings. This objectivity helps to maintain professionalism and allows others who read the report to understand the events without any ambiguity.

A sequential format is important because it provides a clear timeline of events, making it easier for anyone reviewing the documentation to follow the progression of the intervention. This helps in analyzing how the situation developed and the response actions taken at each stage.

Completeness in documentation ensures that all relevant details are captured, providing a comprehensive overview of the intervention. This may include descriptions of the behavior that led to the crisis, the strategies used in the intervention, and the follow-up actions taken post-crisis.

By adhering to these principles, the documentation serves its intended purpose of providing a reliable account that can be referenced in future situations or for further evaluations.